data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f98c0/f98c0448157a96f88f9b158a45bddc57e17247c9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/555ea/555ea1940cee353b0ae3deb0607c945c97b70c24" alt=""
I'm pretty sure that lens quality is the next area-for-improvement rather than MP, but for sure, consumers are still fooled into buying more pixels and less quality. (And if Canon comes up with the goods, I'll switch, OK?)
Today Nikon have announced the D700 and the flash SB-900. These two products - to me - is camera porn. I love all things technical, love reading the specs, love trying out all the functions. And my girlfriend suffers.
But I also feel sorry for all the people that have bought the D300. Surely a D700 - with the superb sensor of the D3 - is a much better option if you want to go with a smaller camera body (and presumably a smaller budget)?
And for D3 users there's another annoyance: the have introduced dust removal on the D700 as well, so why buy a D3 anymore? Anyway, I don't want to berate the cameras that I love the most and its good to see that Nikon are forging ahead. Having been at Wimbledon the past week I have also noticed a fair shift away from the white lenses as well, so come on Nikon!
And when uber-photographer and SportsShooter.com founder Robert Hanashiro of USA Today a - a long time Canon user - says that they have switched to Nikon, it means a lot (p.2 in the interview).
As for image quality though, there's only one brand to trust: Swedish-made Hasselblad's of course...I have a whole (film) system gathering dust at home, any takers? Their 39MP sensor produces some decent stuff though, I have to admit.
But so does the D2Hs, my current work camera, and it only boasts 4MP (below).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/439d7/439d7d56adb21a07e1bebb9a3fa5b5339df44a37" alt=""
Nadal goes for power on a double handed forehand shot. © Magnus Andersson
No comments:
Post a Comment